Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Friday, January 15, 2010
Pokemon Emerald Working Cheats
Soil Pollution Water
As we all know, the earth is our great home and he only thing we have. Therefore it is important to check your balance and behaviors that take into account the natural balance , which is affected in
more by inconsiderate and selfish acts of man to their environment and lack of respect for other existing species on earth.
While soil degradation much waste and cycle back to its natural components, much of the matter can not be degraded by the complexity of their molecules, such as plastic, created man, depending on the complexity of its molecular structure, it takes hundreds of years to decompose.
Therefore it is necessary to take into account the largest possible amount of pollutants in the soil to begin the change.
pollutants Elements soil
1.metal
Metals such as Aluminum, Arsenic, Cadmium, Copper, Chromium, Mercury, Lead Zinc and disrupt plant cells by inhibiting their growth and reproduction, its core functions, the concentration of nutrients in the plant as well as alter and / or inhibit photosynthesis, the process by which plants use carbon dioxide and water from the environment and generate their own food, releasing oxygen into the atmosphere.
2.Plaguicidas
While pesticides are a guarantee for the improvement of crops and elimination of pests, mismanagement and overuse eventually degrade the soil. The potential of the pesticide as a contaminant is specific depending on what is used; depe nde their physical, chemical and biological weapons.
3.Detergentes
detergents have a high potential for polluting the environment and causing changes q uímicos in water and soil, which removes microfauna and microflora or favoring its excessive reproduction. In general the effect of detergents in water and soil is the removal of the diversity of flora and fauna which creates a homogenization of components that favors the reduction of oxygen content which leads to putrefaction which depletes the soil.
toxic waste 4.Volume
Currently the volume of waste we produce is critical in large part due to increased use of goods with non-returnable containers. The components of waste can be categorized into groups according to the time it takes to degrade.
are generally used in solid and liquid packaging. Because plastics are not degradable in the short term. When burned produce toxic gases. Generally are not recyclable but reusable.
These materials are used for different things like food packaging, auto parts, fertilizers, etc. Are materials that degrade easily making them completely biodegradable and are completely reusable. The paper fibers are 95% recyclable. Wax paper is used to wrap sweets, snacks, etc. Degradation is slower than paper but can be processed in the same way than this.
drinks and are used for various types of product. The material can be melted and recycled as well reuse (returnable).
are materials that can be processed in the same way that paper (spraying and burning), which makes them completely biodegradable and recycling is more feasible the role of economic status.
Used nothing more than propaganda articles, books, cards, etc. There is a degradable material, recoverable or reusable ..
Polystyrene and PVC (polyvinyl chloride)
Polystyrene is used mostly in packing of fragile devices. Remains inert in the trash long periods of time. Yet there is no recovery techniques for this material is reused and only thermal insulation systems. PVC is used for packaging of various products and toxic gases to be incinerated.
These containers can not be incinerated because they explode when overheated. They are reusable and recyclable.
This material is not degradable, it is not reusable and can be recycling but the process is very expensive.
When these materials break down, stem rust. You can compress and generally are not reusable but recovered some of them to do tin. 
5. Recycling
Ideally start at home. In many regions it is usual to separate the garbage, which facilitates recycling and this helps to speed up the recovery process material which influences the reduction of environmental degradation and not create new materials through the costly process and contaminants.
Some forms of recycling and tips for everyday life
Paper
- 250 newspapers to manufacture battery needed
- reuse Where possible roles as subway cards, flyers, brochures, printed paper, all As a side may be rewritten.
- For printing or photocopying, if possible using both sides of the leaves. In the case of pre-printed sheets, reused, where possible, using them as blank side of the notebook or to print or write new notes, not use fresh leaves if not entirely necessary.
- The advertisements that give us the street we can use them as paper to leave notes, called, etc, instead of throwing them away and buy blocks of paper: We save paper and money.
- We must reduce the use of toilet paper and disposable napkins. Each year Europe consumed 13kg of this type of paper; if in 2025 there in the world 8 billion people who use toilet paper in the privacy of the same reason that Europeans need cut each year 1,576 km2 of mature forests to make the roll. Let's use cleaning rags, handkerchiefs when we are cold and dish cloths.
- 's buy toilet paper made from recycled fiber. 's use ecological paper with official badges to ensure that the use of materials, energy and water in manufacturing is the best.
- Change the use of paper by using bidet, where possible and use a towel to dry off.
Compost mulch
- Organic matter can be recycled to create compost for our plants. Shells and unused parts of fruits and vegetables used to create this art that brings plenty of nutrients to the plants.
Reuse and waste separation
- Separate waste: plastic and organic waste cardboard. So the same may be collected and later recycled properly.
- Plastic bottles can be reused as containers for any use (to save water in the fridge, use them as flower pots, water containers for use as garbage Tachito; to free choice).
- If possible carry bags, canvas bags ecological (the offer in supermarkets) or reuse the plastic bags we have at home, reduce or avoid the use of them.
- Reduce use of plastic in general incorporating the use of other materials such as glass, metal, etc. When we try to buy drinks buy glass containers which are returnable and reused or recyclable tin. The dishes as possible (bowl, jugs, plates) be of glass, ceramic, aluminum, stainless steel, etc.
-
- Matches can be reused after being fired for the first time if they were not completely burned. Can simply be saved back to the box and pin back into the water heater or other flame instead of throwing them away, and wood and save money.
-
orange rind and lavender have properties that repel the moths in the closet, we can reuse them using them in permeable fabric bags and store them in drawers, closets, etc.. - containers of jam, cheese spreads and others, either plastic or glass can be reused as macetines, bowls, containers for storing lentils, beans, and others and redecorated fideítos to give any other uses (key holder, to keep coins, hair ponytails, barrettes, small utensils, etc.).
- peels of fruits such as tangerine, lemon, or others, can be dried and reused, instead of throwing-to scent rooms, drawers or other dry putting them in bags.
- waste vegetables and fruits that are not able or willing to use more than can be used to fertilize the soil burial or create fertilizer (see links below).
- fabrics when they are old towels can be reused as cleaning rags or other, as we know are super absorbent and save money by reusing.
- incorporate the use of non-disposable diapers for our babies: the technology has advanced considerably since started using disposables, which incidentally takes 450 years to decompose and pollute lot, and aroused new cloth diapers that are super ecological and economic, prevent and relieve paspaduras, not conducive to moisture, washed in washing machine and above all, do not pollute! Saves money and the environment (+ info see link end of article.)
- also incorporated the use of feminine wipes fabric: This is not back in time, like diapers, technology has come a long way and it is time that we make use it correctly, helping to keep the planet clean. They are absorbent, do not stain! easy to store, easy to clean, economic (they have a lifespan of up to 4 years) and the best: We must not discard them, simply wash and reused and will not contaminate us women (disposable wipes and panty liners and tampons the containing dioxin that pollutes our body, and the process established for these products also contaminates the environment!) cloth wipes are made with cotton, born in a cocoon after the end of their use (5 years on average), when discarded, take the
- Avoid using aerosol sprays containing chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) as has been proven that the polluter environ ronment e.
Tuesday, January 12, 2010
How Do U Get A Scorpio Man To Want U
Mere thoughts ... Selected Letters
sleeping Giants ...
By Leon Hispanic
"It is true that the world is full of many dangers,
and in it many places gloomy,
but there are also many beautiful things,
and although love is everywhere together today to grief, it is none
less powerful "(LotR I)
I was turning in his head that phrase, that my father shared with me as we talked, a typical rainy afternoon in the Shire
And in my attempt to find pictures ... I think I found a spectacular, of the Ents asleep ... those trees are attacked viciously by a world that tries to take advantage of them for the establishment of the kingdom of indefinite progress .
If I may, I take the audacity to avail myself of that image, so well made by Tolkien in his "The Lord of the Rings" to try to shed some light on what happens to us today, without wishing to exhaust it. I think that is a constant in the work of our friend. Take only a few features that can be applied to us.
In today's world, the army of evil grow excessively, destroying natural order ... the wrong moves and we are still there, asleep, not responding as if nothing happened. But just by looking a little, we must realize that all is not well in the world and the Church
us unimaginable strength, a virtue that comes from God himself, "because in Him we are, live and exist." And the same Christ our Lord and King said "Kingdom of Heaven must suffer violence." then what should be the fear that paralyzes us? Why are we there, motionless, while everything seems to fall apart? We must be calm and safe, because we were promised
ents are reflected in the several realities:
one hand, taking into account office, that of Pastors , I think inevitably the
On the other hand, we are also represented there each of us . As Pope Pius XII said, has established "tired of the good." seems that there are no reasons why wake up and fight "the good fight" Pauline. Christ is coming soon, not when, but it is under way. Must then find waking up and fighting for the establishment of United, which is already among us, in our hearts, but to be manifest in the world. So the king answered the call. Take courage to serve.
How not also see all the Christian West, represented asleep there in those woods. That culture that once was able to give life to all the world. She must rise again, breaking the bonds of the darkness, giving new life to this world of death. So you wake up, the West must emerge, must stand up and be "light of nations" . Our culture is equated with the wisdom of the authorities. That culture must be sap of life to new shoots. Savia to forward, to deliver, it is tradition.
Much can be said and add in this regard. This is just an idea that wandered through my head. But remember that Return of the King this closely and will take place at any time. Remember also that the Ents awoke and went into battle, in which his role was not minor. May our Lord in His Second Coming will find us standing like Ents giants, giants of the forest, alert and on guard .
Friday, January 8, 2010
Increase My Processer
Letter 250, Tolkien Michael
November 1, 1963
My dear M.:
Thanks for writing ... Long last! I do not think you've inherited from my dislike of writing letters, but the inability to write briefly. Which means, inevitably, rarely in your life (and mine). I think we both like to write letters ad family; but we are forced to write both "business" that fail us time and energy.
I'm sorry you feel depressed. I hope this is partly a result of your illness. But I fear that is above all an occupational affliction and human disease almost universal (any occupation) associated with your age .... I remember quite clearly the time when I was your age (in 1935). Had become 10 years before (still innocent and trusting, full of the illusions of youth) to Oxford, I now disliked the students and their style and had really begun to know the professors. Years earlier had rejected as repugnant cynicism a vulgar person own the words of warning that told me the old Joseph Wright: "What are you looking at Oxford, boy?" "A university, a place of learning." "On the contrary, boy, is a factory! And you know what it does? I'll tell you. Is making fees. Get it on the head and begin to understand what happens. "
In 1935, alas, I knew that was perfectly true. Anyway, as a key to the conduct of professors. Perfectly true, but not the whole truth. (The largest part of the truth is always hidden in regions beyond the reach of cynicism.) I applied stonewalling and was hampered in my efforts (as a teacher of class B with partial salary, but with duties of class A) for the sake of the subject and the reform of teaching, scholarship by vested interests and fees. But at least I have not suffered like you, never forced me to teach anything but love (and love) with unquenchable enthusiasm. (Except for a brief time after my change of Chair in 1945: it was awful.)
devotion to the "teaching" as such and without reference to one's reputation is a high calling and in a sense to a spiritual vocation, and since it is "high" is inevitably lowered by false brethren, brothers tired, by the desire for money and pride when people say "my subject" and thus does not mean the subject in which I am humbly bent, but the subject that I have decks or 'made me. " Surely this devotion usually degrades and sullies in universities. But there still is-ta. And if they are close to contempt, would disappear from the face of the earth ... until they are re-established in corruption again in due time. The much greater devotion to religion can not possibly escape the same process. Of course it is degraded to some extent by all the "professional" (and by all professing Christians), and some, at different times and places, outraged, and as the goal is higher, the downside seems (and is) far worse. But you can not maintain a tradition of teaching or true science without schools and universities, and that means teachers and professors. And you can not maintain a religion without a church and ministers, and that means professionals, priests and bishops ... and monks. The precious wine must (this world) have a bottle or a substitute even less valuable. For my part, I find that I become less cynical, not otherwise pro-remembering my own sins and follies, and I realize that the hearts of men is often not as bad as their acts, and rarely as bad as their words. (Especially at our age, age of derision and cynicism. We are more free from hypocrisy, it does not "block" profess holiness or feelings quite high, but it is an age of hypocrisy as the widely-used inverted snobbery of the day: men profess to be worse than they are .)... .
But you speak of "faith weakened." That is another matter altogether. Ultimately, faith is an act of will, inspired by love. Our love can be cooled and our will deteriorate by the sight of the shortcomings, the madness, even the sins of the Church and its ministers, but do not think anyone who has ever had faith, back beyond its limit For these reasons (me-us anyone who has any historical knowledge). The "scandal" at most is a time of temptation, as it is the indecency of lust, which does not, but the wake. It is desirable because it tends to look away from ourselves and our own faults to find a scapegoat. But the act of the will of faith is not a single moment of final decision: it is a permanent act indefinitely repeated, ie a state that must be pursued so that we pray for obtaining a "final perseverance." The temptation of "disbelief" (which really means rejection of Our Lord and demands) is always present within us. A part of us longs to have an excuse to get out. The stronger is the temptation interior, more quickly and seriously we "stumble" others. I think I'm as sensitive as you (or any other Christian) to 'scandals', both clergy and laity. I suffered a lot in my life because of stupid priests, tired, dazed and even evil, but I know enough of me to be aware that I must not leave the church (which for me would mean abandoning the alliance with Our Lord) by none of those reasons: I do not believe should leave or no longer believe even though he had never met anyone of orders is not wise and holy time. Deny the Blessed Sacrament, that is, God called a fraud in his face. If he was a fraud and the Gospels, fraudulent, ie selected episodes with malicious intent of a mad megalomaniac (which is the only alternative), in this case, of course, the show displayed by the Church (in the sense the clergy) in history and today is a simple test of a gigantic fraud co. But if not, this show is, alas, only what was expected: it started before the first Easter faith does not affect at all, except insofar as we can and we should be very sorry. But we should grieve for our Lord, identifying with the offended, not saints, not to claim that we can not "tolerate" Judas Iscariot, or even the absurd and cowardly Simon Peter or the stupid women like the mother of James, who tried to put their children ahead. requires a great incredulity will assume that Jesus never really "took place" and even more to believe that he never said the things that he has been registered, so incapable was anyone in the world at that time of "invention" insert them " : such as "before Abraham came to be I am" (John VIII), "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father "(John, IX), or the enactment of the Blessed Sacrament in John, V:" Whoever has eaten my flesh and drink my blood has eternal life. " Therefore, either we believe in Him and what he said and stick to consequences, or reject it and face the consequences. I find it hard to believe that anyone who has taken the Communion, even once, at least with the right intention, can never again reject it without serious fault. (However, only He knows all souls and their unique circumstances.) The only cure for the weakening of faith is Communion. Although it is always the same, perfect and complete and inviolate, the Blessed Sacrament not operate the everything and once in any of us. As the act of faith, should be continued and enhanced, by exercise. Frequency has the highest impact. Seven times a week is more nourishing than seven times at intervals. I can also recommend this as an exercise (too easy it is, alas, find oppor-tunity for it): take communion in circumstances that are adverse to your liking. Choose a priest or a nasal or charlatan proud and vulgar friar, and a church full of the usual bourgeois, misbehaving children, of those who claim to be a product of Catholic schools, which at the time of opening the tent, sit and yawning, young dirty and neck open shirt, trousers women's hair at a time neglected and overdrafts. Go to take communion with them (and pray for them.) Be the same (or even me-Jor) a Mass said beautifully by a visibly virtuous man, and shared by a few devout and decorous people. (It could not have been worse than the confusion raised by feeding the Five Thousand, after which [our] Lord exposed food was coming.) I convinced the right of Peter, and watching the world around us does not seem to be little doubt (if Christianity is true) about what the True Church, the temple of the Spirit, dying but alive corrupt, but sa-grade, self-reform and re-established. But to me that Church which the Pope is the acknowledged head of the earth's main claim is that which has always maintained (and still advocates) the Blessed Sacrament, has revered do in the highest degree and has since ( as Christ obviously wanted it) first. The last thing entrusted to Peter was "Feed my sheep" and as His words should always be understood literally, I guess that relate primarily to the Bread of Life. It was against this that launched the revolution in Western Europe (or Reform) - "the blasphemous fable of the Mass" - and the opposition between works and faith, just a false clue. I guess the biggest reform of our time was carried out by Saint Pius X, surpassed anything, it was necessary that the Council achieved. I wonder what state the Church would find it not been for her. Go
so alarming and rambling disquisition! Not intended as a sermon! I have no doubt that you know all this and more. I am an ignorant man, but alone. And I take this opportunity to speak, which I am sure, would not use ever orally. But of course, worried about my children live, that in this world hard, cruel and mocking of which survive, they must suffer more attacks than I have suffered. But I am one who has left Egypt and pray to God that none of my seed has never go back there. I have witnessed (comprising half) of the heroic sufferings and early death in extreme poverty of my mother, who was the one who introduced me to the church, and received the amazing love of Francis Morgan. But I fell in love with the Blessed Sacrament from the beginning, and the mercy of God I have not ever fall: but, alas, I have not lived up to it. I have brought up all wrong and I have spoken very little. By evil and laziness I have almost ceased to practice my religion, especially in Leeds, and 22 Northmoor Road. Not for me the Hound of Heaven, but the incessant silent call of the Tabernacle and the feeling of a deadly famine. Bitterly regret those days (and suffer for them with all the patience that gives me), especially because I failed as a parent. Now I pray for you all, relentlessly, to the Curator [Healer] (the Hælend as the Savior was usually called Old English) to correct my faults and none of you ever stop to exclaim: Benedict qui venit in nomine Domini. (...)
The letter is not complete, is only a fragment.
November 1, 1963
76 Sandfield Road, Headington, Oxford
My dear M.:
Thanks for writing ... Long last! I do not think you've inherited from my dislike of writing letters, but the inability to write briefly. Which means, inevitably, rarely in your life (and mine). I think we both like to write letters ad family; but we are forced to write both "business" that fail us time and energy.
I'm sorry you feel depressed. I hope this is partly a result of your illness. But I fear that is above all an occupational affliction and human disease almost universal (any occupation) associated with your age .... I remember quite clearly the time when I was your age (in 1935). Had become 10 years before (still innocent and trusting, full of the illusions of youth) to Oxford, I now disliked the students and their style and had really begun to know the professors. Years earlier had rejected as repugnant cynicism a vulgar person own the words of warning that told me the old Joseph Wright: "What are you looking at Oxford, boy?" "A university, a place of learning." "On the contrary, boy, is a factory! And you know what it does? I'll tell you. Is making fees. Get it on the head and begin to understand what happens. "
In 1935, alas, I knew that was perfectly true. Anyway, as a key to the conduct of professors. Perfectly true, but not the whole truth. (The largest part of the truth is always hidden in regions beyond the reach of cynicism.) I applied stonewalling and was hampered in my efforts (as a teacher of class B with partial salary, but with duties of class A) for the sake of the subject and the reform of teaching, scholarship by vested interests and fees. But at least I have not suffered like you, never forced me to teach anything but love (and love) with unquenchable enthusiasm. (Except for a brief time after my change of Chair in 1945: it was awful.)
devotion to the "teaching" as such and without reference to one's reputation is a high calling and in a sense to a spiritual vocation, and since it is "high" is inevitably lowered by false brethren, brothers tired, by the desire for money and pride when people say "my subject" and thus does not mean the subject in which I am humbly bent, but the subject that I have decks or 'made me. " Surely this devotion usually degrades and sullies in universities. But there still is-ta. And if they are close to contempt, would disappear from the face of the earth ... until they are re-established in corruption again in due time. The much greater devotion to religion can not possibly escape the same process. Of course it is degraded to some extent by all the "professional" (and by all professing Christians), and some, at different times and places, outraged, and as the goal is higher, the downside seems (and is) far worse. But you can not maintain a tradition of teaching or true science without schools and universities, and that means teachers and professors. And you can not maintain a religion without a church and ministers, and that means professionals, priests and bishops ... and monks. The precious wine must (this world) have a bottle or a substitute even less valuable. For my part, I find that I become less cynical, not otherwise pro-remembering my own sins and follies, and I realize that the hearts of men is often not as bad as their acts, and rarely as bad as their words. (Especially at our age, age of derision and cynicism. We are more free from hypocrisy, it does not "block" profess holiness or feelings quite high, but it is an age of hypocrisy as the widely-used inverted snobbery of the day: men profess to be worse than they are .)... .
But you speak of "faith weakened." That is another matter altogether. Ultimately, faith is an act of will, inspired by love. Our love can be cooled and our will deteriorate by the sight of the shortcomings, the madness, even the sins of the Church and its ministers, but do not think anyone who has ever had faith, back beyond its limit For these reasons (me-us anyone who has any historical knowledge). The "scandal" at most is a time of temptation, as it is the indecency of lust, which does not, but the wake. It is desirable because it tends to look away from ourselves and our own faults to find a scapegoat. But the act of the will of faith is not a single moment of final decision: it is a permanent act indefinitely repeated, ie a state that must be pursued so that we pray for obtaining a "final perseverance." The temptation of "disbelief" (which really means rejection of Our Lord and demands) is always present within us. A part of us longs to have an excuse to get out. The stronger is the temptation interior, more quickly and seriously we "stumble" others. I think I'm as sensitive as you (or any other Christian) to 'scandals', both clergy and laity. I suffered a lot in my life because of stupid priests, tired, dazed and even evil, but I know enough of me to be aware that I must not leave the church (which for me would mean abandoning the alliance with Our Lord) by none of those reasons: I do not believe should leave or no longer believe even though he had never met anyone of orders is not wise and holy time. Deny the Blessed Sacrament, that is, God called a fraud in his face. If he was a fraud and the Gospels, fraudulent, ie selected episodes with malicious intent of a mad megalomaniac (which is the only alternative), in this case, of course, the show displayed by the Church (in the sense the clergy) in history and today is a simple test of a gigantic fraud co. But if not, this show is, alas, only what was expected: it started before the first Easter faith does not affect at all, except insofar as we can and we should be very sorry. But we should grieve for our Lord, identifying with the offended, not saints, not to claim that we can not "tolerate" Judas Iscariot, or even the absurd and cowardly Simon Peter or the stupid women like the mother of James, who tried to put their children ahead. requires a great incredulity will assume that Jesus never really "took place" and even more to believe that he never said the things that he has been registered, so incapable was anyone in the world at that time of "invention" insert them " : such as "before Abraham came to be I am" (John VIII), "Whoever has seen me has seen the Father "(John, IX), or the enactment of the Blessed Sacrament in John, V:" Whoever has eaten my flesh and drink my blood has eternal life. " Therefore, either we believe in Him and what he said and stick to consequences, or reject it and face the consequences. I find it hard to believe that anyone who has taken the Communion, even once, at least with the right intention, can never again reject it without serious fault. (However, only He knows all souls and their unique circumstances.) The only cure for the weakening of faith is Communion. Although it is always the same, perfect and complete and inviolate, the Blessed Sacrament not operate the everything and once in any of us. As the act of faith, should be continued and enhanced, by exercise. Frequency has the highest impact. Seven times a week is more nourishing than seven times at intervals. I can also recommend this as an exercise (too easy it is, alas, find oppor-tunity for it): take communion in circumstances that are adverse to your liking. Choose a priest or a nasal or charlatan proud and vulgar friar, and a church full of the usual bourgeois, misbehaving children, of those who claim to be a product of Catholic schools, which at the time of opening the tent, sit and yawning, young dirty and neck open shirt, trousers women's hair at a time neglected and overdrafts. Go to take communion with them (and pray for them.) Be the same (or even me-Jor) a Mass said beautifully by a visibly virtuous man, and shared by a few devout and decorous people. (It could not have been worse than the confusion raised by feeding the Five Thousand, after which [our] Lord exposed food was coming.) I convinced the right of Peter, and watching the world around us does not seem to be little doubt (if Christianity is true) about what the True Church, the temple of the Spirit, dying but alive corrupt, but sa-grade, self-reform and re-established. But to me that Church which the Pope is the acknowledged head of the earth's main claim is that which has always maintained (and still advocates) the Blessed Sacrament, has revered do in the highest degree and has since ( as Christ obviously wanted it) first. The last thing entrusted to Peter was "Feed my sheep" and as His words should always be understood literally, I guess that relate primarily to the Bread of Life. It was against this that launched the revolution in Western Europe (or Reform) - "the blasphemous fable of the Mass" - and the opposition between works and faith, just a false clue. I guess the biggest reform of our time was carried out by Saint Pius X, surpassed anything, it was necessary that the Council achieved. I wonder what state the Church would find it not been for her. Go
so alarming and rambling disquisition! Not intended as a sermon! I have no doubt that you know all this and more. I am an ignorant man, but alone. And I take this opportunity to speak, which I am sure, would not use ever orally. But of course, worried about my children live, that in this world hard, cruel and mocking of which survive, they must suffer more attacks than I have suffered. But I am one who has left Egypt and pray to God that none of my seed has never go back there. I have witnessed (comprising half) of the heroic sufferings and early death in extreme poverty of my mother, who was the one who introduced me to the church, and received the amazing love of Francis Morgan. But I fell in love with the Blessed Sacrament from the beginning, and the mercy of God I have not ever fall: but, alas, I have not lived up to it. I have brought up all wrong and I have spoken very little. By evil and laziness I have almost ceased to practice my religion, especially in Leeds, and 22 Northmoor Road. Not for me the Hound of Heaven, but the incessant silent call of the Tabernacle and the feeling of a deadly famine. Bitterly regret those days (and suffer for them with all the patience that gives me), especially because I failed as a parent. Now I pray for you all, relentlessly, to the Curator [Healer] (the Hælend as the Savior was usually called Old English) to correct my faults and none of you ever stop to exclaim: Benedict qui venit in nomine Domini. (...)
The letter is not complete, is only a fragment.
Monday, January 4, 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)